The Constitution of the United States of America protects many civil rights, in particular the freedom of speech. The inclusion of liberties in the Constitution was geared at ensuring that the police powers of the U. S. government are curtailed. The notion of rights is always the most fundamental issue when it comes to matters of democracy protection. The article was created by an essay writing service https://essays-writing-service.com/

The reason of violation of the liberty of speech is its importance especially when it comes to political matters. The right is particularly interrupted since it is not an absolute one. However, while the legislation provides that the interruption must be done in accordance with the law, many officials usually avoid the responsibility by making themselves eligible to the defense of lawful limitation of the right. One of the cases that the regulations permit restrictions with regard to this liberty is a state of insecurity. While the essence of such constraints usually presupposes general well-being of all the residents of the United States of America, in many instances, the provisions of the law are misused to protect selfish interests of official authorities. For example, whenever citizens go on a demonstration claiming that the government has failed to provide them with the required necessities, some civil servants who are responsible for the corrupt scandals suppress these protests for the sake of social security. Secondly, the right can be limited for preservation of public order that is another measure to which these officials resort in order to deny the U.S. nationals the enjoyment of this prerogative and fundamental freedom. Furthermore, the liberty of speech is restricted by law if individual’s words are aimed at inciting hatred among people of the United States of America. The regulations further allows the interruption of this entitlement on the basis that such voiced ideas amount to propaganda for war. While these tools are necessary to ensure democracy if wisely used, most police officers and government officials abuse these exceptions.

The law enforcement agencies and the authorities apply these methods as a way of defeating their political opponents and enemies. Thus, they make certain that their rivals do not get an opportunity to address people. Secondly, the human rights activists are also frequently denied this liberty.

A part of solving the issue of the freedom of speech violation is the need to amend the laws concerning its execution since the Constitution has already recognized the right. One of the ways is to limit the powers of the police regarding the arrest of innocent demonstrators, whose intention is to show their agitations for the governmental actions. Moreover, the punishment of the law enforcement officers should be more severe. Hence, any officer who is found restricting the liberty of speech without reasonable justification should be dismissed or a hefty fine should be imposed on him. The Constitution is enough to protect the freedom of expression but its enactment is marred by the bad faith. The only way to guarantee that those concerned exercise the limitation powers in due order is to adopt the law, which imposes heavy sanctions on the ones charged with protecting the right. Additionally, such a regulation should confirm that the exact scope of constraints are indicated so that the discretionary authority of the police to curtail this privilege is minimized.

In conclusion, the right to freedom of speech is the cornerstone of democracy in any country where limitation should therefore be exercised very sparingly. The liberty of expression should only be restricted in case of acute insecurity, hatred, defamation but not for the purposes of political scheming. Hence, strict penalties should be introduced to ensure that implementation the right is secured.